Hi Fred, On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:23 PM, fred veldini <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe this will help > > I did a dmesg on the routers and have a bunch of these messages on the > routers in LISTEN state
Just to confirm: all neighbors toward the router in LISTEN show it as LISTEN, right? > WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/desc.c:272 > ath5k_hw_setup_4word_tx_desc+0x66/0x1a4 [ath5k]() > > They are only on the routers that are not connected. > > Fred > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:06 PM, fred veldini <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> I just added another 2 nodes to the mesh and they are having random issues >> with LISTEN and no MFP >> >> So I have a total of 6 nodes online now. With 4 ESTAB and the rest LISTEN >> and no MFP >> >> The funny thing is if I reboot all 6 routers they will randomly ESTAB and >> LISTEN. Not like there is something to point at. >> >> I still get the same messages as below. >> >> Is there a way to identify what level of AUTHSAE is failing that I can >> try? >> >> Fred >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:47 PM, fred veldini <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Chun-Yeow, >>> >>> I tried it without nohwcrypt=1 and still the same issue. >>> >>> Fred >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Yeoh Chun-Yeow <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, Fred >>>> >>>> Using the latest compat-wireless, you can ignore the nohwcrypt=1 while >>>> loading ath5k. >>>> >>>> --- >>>> Chun-Yeow >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 8:42 AM, fred veldini <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > Ok I recompiled without the older patch and still have the same >>>> > issues. >>>> > >>>> > I did try to create the mesh without authsae and everything works >>>> > fine. >>>> > >>>> > Is there anything I can do to help identify the issue? >>>> > >>>> > Thanks >>>> > >>>> > Fred >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:33 PM, fred veldini <[email protected]> >>>> > wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> I will try it and let you know, thanks for the quick reply. >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Thomas Pedersen <[email protected]> >>>> >> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:49 PM, fred veldini >>>> >>> <[email protected]> >>>> >>> wrote: >>>> >>> > Hello Group, >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > I have been testing a multiple node mesh with ath5k and Authsae, >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > We are working our way up to 15 units in a mesh to do some stress >>>> >>> > testing. >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > We have run into a snag and not sure what to look at from here. >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > We have latest Kernel 3.6 with latest Compat-wireless build >>>> >>> > We have the latest iw and authsae from GIT >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > Everything comes up and on-line with out any problem initially. >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > The issue we see is that some units, (Not all of them and not all >>>> >>> > the >>>> >>> > same >>>> >>> > units) will show >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > NL80211_CMD_NEW_PEER_CANDIDATE(1349901686.331237) >>>> >>> > new unauthed sta (seq num=1349901526) >>>> >>> > NL80211_CMD_NEW_STATION (1349901686.331237) >>>> >>> > NL80211_CMD_NEW_PEER_CANDIDATE(1349901701.695901) >>>> >>> > new unauthed sta (seq num=1349901527) >>>> >>> > NL80211_CMD_NEW_STATION (1349901701.696901) >>>> >>> > NL80211_CMD_NEW_PEER_CANDIDATE(1349901717.61565) >>>> >>> > new unauthed sta (seq num=1349901528) >>>> >>> > NL80211_CMD_NEW_STATION (1349901717.61565) >>>> >>> > NL80211_CMD_NEW_PEER_CANDIDATE(1349901732.426229) >>>> >>> > new unauthed sta (seq num=1349901529) >>>> >>> > NL80211_CMD_NEW_STATION (1349901732.426229) >>>> >>> > NL80211_CMD_NEW_PEER_CANDIDATE(1349901747.790893) >>>> >>> > new unauthed sta (seq num=1349901530) >>>> >>> > NL80211_CMD_NEW_STATION (1349901747.791893) >>>> >>> > NL80211_CMD_NEW_PEER_CANDIDATE(1349901762.131713) >>>> >>> > new unauthed sta (seq num=1349901531) >>>> >>> > NL80211_CMD_NEW_STATION (1349901762.131713) >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > If I do a iw dev mesh2 station dump I see >>>> >>> > iw dev mesh2 station dump >>>> >>> > Station 00:15:6d:94:4f:76 (on mesh2) >>>> >>> > inactive time: 545 ms >>>> >>> > rx bytes: 800 >>>> >>> > rx packets: 16 >>>> >>> > tx bytes: 0 >>>> >>> > tx packets: 0 >>>> >>> > tx retries: 0 >>>> >>> > tx failed: 0 >>>> >>> > signal: -30 dBm >>>> >>> > signal avg: -30 dBm >>>> >>> > Toffset: 10133145424 us >>>> >>> > tx bitrate: 1.0 MBit/s >>>> >>> > mesh llid: 0 >>>> >>> > mesh plid: 0 >>>> >>> > mesh plink: LISTEN ------ LISTEN STATE COULD BE ATTRIBUTED >>>> >>> > BY >>>> >>> > NO >>>> >>> > MFP? >>>> >>> > authorized: no >>>> >>> > authenticated: no >>>> >>> > preamble: long >>>> >>> > WMM/WME: yes >>>> >>> > MFP: no ------- NOTICE NO MFP >>>> >>> > TDLS peer: no >>>> >>> > Station 00:15:6d:94:5a:39 (on mesh2) >>>> >>> > inactive time: 17702 ms >>>> >>> > rx bytes: 1539 >>>> >>> > rx packets: 23 >>>> >>> > tx bytes: 1090 >>>> >>> > tx packets: 7 >>>> >>> > tx retries: 6 >>>> >>> > tx failed: 1 >>>> >>> > signal: -62 dBm >>>> >>> > signal avg: -61 dBm >>>> >>> > tx bitrate: 1.0 MBit/s >>>> >>> > mesh llid: 0 >>>> >>> > mesh plid: 0 >>>> >>> > mesh plink: ESTAB >>>> >>> > authorized: yes >>>> >>> > authenticated: yes >>>> >>> > preamble: long >>>> >>> > WMM/WME: yes >>>> >>> > MFP: yes >>>> >>> > TDLS peer: no >>>> >>> > Station 00:15:6d:94:6e:6b (on mesh2) >>>> >>> > inactive time: 721 ms >>>> >>> > rx bytes: 544314 >>>> >>> > rx packets: 6054 >>>> >>> > tx bytes: 254624 >>>> >>> > tx packets: 883 >>>> >>> > tx retries: 58 >>>> >>> > tx failed: 0 >>>> >>> > signal: -46 dBm >>>> >>> > signal avg: -46 dBm >>>> >>> > Toffset: 490313930 us >>>> >>> > tx bitrate: 54.0 MBit/s >>>> >>> > mesh llid: 0 >>>> >>> > mesh plid: 0 >>>> >>> > mesh plink: ESTAB >>>> >>> > authorized: yes >>>> >>> > authenticated: yes >>>> >>> > preamble: long >>>> >>> > WMM/WME: yes >>>> >>> > MFP: yes >>>> >>> > TDLS peer: no >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > If I reboot the routers the same thing happens. >>>> >>> > I have tried with and without nohwencrypt=1 >>>> >>> > I have also applied the patch >>>> >>> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg95993.html which >>>> >>> > was >>>> >>> > missing >>>> >>> > for the latest build >>>> >>> > any help on what to look for would be appreciated. >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> >>>> >>> I think this patch: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1429831/ was >>>> >>> meant to replace the one you applied. Can you try without >>>> >>> Chun-Yeow's >>>> >>> original mgmt frame encryption patch for ath5k? >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Thomas >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>>> >>> Devel mailing list >>>> >>> [email protected] >>>> >>> http://lists.open80211s.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > Devel mailing list >>>> > [email protected] >>>> > http://lists.open80211s.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Devel mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.open80211s.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel >>> >>> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.open80211s.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel > _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.open80211s.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
