I think this - as it looks like a private communication by email (presumably) - puts the disciplinary action into question. Did anyone see it but HB?
If that could be clarified it would be helpful, but perhaps it needs to be a separate issue to the MySociety riposte. Matt On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Tom Steinberg <[email protected]> wrote: > I've just had a phone chat with Lisa Greenwood, the sacked civil > servant. She's explained, and even been kind enough to send me an > email that I can use as evidence. > > In short, what she told me happened was: > 1.) She used google and ended up on Hazel Blear's page on > TheyWorkForYou.com > 2.) She clicked through from it to Hazel's official site > 3.) She found the 'contact me' page on the official site and then > clicked on the email address, which, using a mailto: tag popped up her > work email client. > 4.) She wrote and sent her fatal email, which was delivered from her > DCSF email account, not her Hotmail which she'd normally use. > > Here's how Lisa describes it in her own words: > > "Dear Tom, > > I googled Hazel Blears and found the website 'they work for you' and > it said to contact Hazel Blears click on the following link > http://www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/hazel_blears/salford I then clicked > on her personal webpage that said 'contact me'. You will have to > contact the DCFS for them to explain their interception. > > Many thanks > > Lisa Greenwood" > > So there it is. I'll use this to ask for a retraction from the > original journalist who seeded the story, and from anyone else who ran > with it and who hasn't corrected by tomorrow. > > best, > > Tom > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list [email protected] > Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: > https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list [email protected] Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
