I just used the link on hazels site to ask her about the sacking (on my own
account/for my own benefit).
I got an autoreply saying the address was only for her constituents, and
noone else would be responded to (so probably the last I'll hear).

Well... there you go...

I should give my own MP a kicking I guess, see if he passes it on and gets
any response (he won't, but I'll enjoy giving him a kicking (again)). Its
just a shame that he will charge all the effort that goes into his
'non-responses' on expenses paid for by... me!!

If only I could make *him* pay me for the time I spend complaining about
him! (without him charging it to expenses).

Paul

2009/7/6 Matt Wardman <[email protected]>

> Just in case amyone has missed it:
>
>
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2009/jul/06/telegraph-hazel-blears-expenses-civil-servant-sacking
>
> Matt
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Steven Clift <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> If you want to discuss the "wider" issue here, feel free to use the UK
>> and Ireland E-Democracy Exchange:
>>
>> http://groups.dowire.org/groups/ukie
>>
>> Steven Clift
>> Democracies Online
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Owen Blacker<[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Thanks, Tom, you're a star.
>> > And yeah, that's obviously where mySociety's interest in the specific
>> issue
>> > ends. The wider issue deserves debate, but here isn't really the
>> appropriate
>> > place.
>> >
>> >
>> > 2009/7/6 Tom Steinberg <[email protected]>
>> >>
>> >> Yes, just to say, I'm not going to get into the business of why she
>> >> was fired, what was said, who told on who and so on. My mission is
>> >> over.
>> >>
>> >> Tom
>> >>
>> >> 2009/7/6 Matt Wardman <[email protected]>:
>> >> > I think this - as it looks like a private communication by email
>> >> > (presumably) - puts the disciplinary action into question. Did anyone
>> >> > see it
>> >> > but HB?
>> >> >
>> >> > If that could be clarified it would be helpful, but perhaps it needs
>> to
>> >> > be a
>> >> > separate issue to the MySociety riposte.
>> >> >
>> >> > Matt
>> >> >
>> >> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Tom Steinberg <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I've just had a phone chat with Lisa Greenwood, the sacked civil
>> >> >> servant. She's explained, and even been kind enough to send me an
>> >> >> email that I can use as evidence.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> In short, what she told me happened was:
>> >> >> 1.) She used google and ended up on Hazel Blear's page on
>> >> >> TheyWorkForYou.com
>> >> >> 2.) She clicked through from it to Hazel's official site
>> >> >> 3.) She found the 'contact me' page on the official site and then
>> >> >> clicked on the email address, which, using a mailto: tag popped up
>> her
>> >> >> work email client.
>> >> >> 4.) She wrote and sent her fatal email, which was delivered from her
>> >> >> DCSF email account, not her Hotmail which she'd normally use.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Here's how Lisa describes it in her own words:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "Dear Tom,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I googled Hazel Blears and found the website 'they work for you' and
>> >> >> it said to contact Hazel Blears click on the following link
>> >> >> http://www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/hazel_blears/salford   I then
>> clicked
>> >> >> on her personal webpage that said  'contact me'.  You will have to
>> >> >> contact the DCFS for them to explain their interception.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Many thanks
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Lisa Greenwood"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> So there it is. I'll use this to ask for a retraction from the
>> >> >> original journalist who seeded the story, and from anyone else who
>> ran
>> >> >> with it and who hasn't corrected by tomorrow.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> best,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Tom
>> >> >>
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> Mailing list [email protected]
>> >> >> Archive, settings, or unsubscribe:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > Mailing list [email protected]
>> >> > Archive, settings, or unsubscribe:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Mailing list [email protected]
>> >> Archive, settings, or unsubscribe:
>> >>
>> >>
>> https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Mailing list [email protected]
>> > Archive, settings, or unsubscribe:
>> >
>> https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Steven Clift - http://stevenclift.com
>> Executive Director - http://E-Democracy.Org
>> Donate today: http://e-democracy.org/donate
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list [email protected]
>> Archive, settings, or unsubscribe:
>>
>> https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list [email protected]
> Archive, settings, or unsubscribe:
> https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
>
_______________________________________________
Mailing list [email protected]
Archive, settings, or unsubscribe:
https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public

Reply via email to