With my ex-employment lawyer's hat on sacking someone for something
they said rather dyspepticly to an MP would be a much weaker ground
than trying to do so over something they had posted on the internet.
In either case I'd not want to build a case on it, which is why there
may be more to the story than meets the eye. Who knows.

Francis

2009/7/6 Matt Wardman <[email protected]>:
> I'll stay off this one until Tom has his retractions.
>
> Matt
>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Tom Steinberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, just to say, I'm not going to get into the business of why she
>> was fired, what was said, who told on who and so on. My mission is
>> over.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list [email protected]
> Archive, settings, or unsubscribe:
> https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
>



-- 
Francis Davey

_______________________________________________
Mailing list [email protected]
Archive, settings, or unsubscribe:
https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public

Reply via email to