On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 08:44:20PM +0000, Ian Eiloart wrote: > > On 3 Jan 2010, at 17:37, Louise Ferguson wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > Can someone confirm to me that there are no (realistic) limits on > > volume/file size submissions by respondents to WDTK? Or whether there > > are.... > > > > If the problem is email, then there's no way to tell the size limit, > since it will vary depending on the email systems of both the sender > and the recipient. The information provider may well be limited to > 10MB per email, but 50MB per email is more common these days. > > Remember, emails are usually seven bit encoded, so files will at > least double in size when attached to an email. > > I don't know WDTK, but it would be sensible if responses could be > uploaded through the web site instead rather than emailed, if that > facility isn't already available.
Yes, that facility is available. There is a link at the bottom of each request, and it authenticates against email addresses at the authority. Francis > Ideally, information providers would be using smaller files (the > problem here is probably images), for environmental reasons. After > all, they all have CO2 targets now. > > > Like if they are trying to argue against providing 200 (reports) x > > 200 KB (max size) to WDTK... > > > > Lou _______________________________________________ Mailing list > > [email protected] Archive, settings, or > > unsubscribe: > > https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public > > -- Ian Eiloart > > > > > _______________________________________________ Mailing list > [email protected] Archive, settings, or > unsubscribe: > https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public > -- Help beat party propaganda at the next election - www.democracyclub.org.uk _______________________________________________ Mailing list [email protected] Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
