> I can delay the end of the vote till thursday, after the meeting, so > people can discuss it as mcuh as they like. However if you cannot simply > make up your mind on the simple qyestion whether we should allow people > access to CVS (yes or no), then there is imo no point in continuing at all.
There is a need for the 3rd party stuff on mmbase (MMBOB is the best example i know). We for the next months will not succeed in making rules that everybody will accept, since people are trying to achieve different goals. As long as we don't agree I don't think it is a good idea to put code in the applications module. But I can live with a packages module (in CVS) where different developer groups can create a working space (based on interests). Those interest groups may create there own rules and sub projects within the group (and keep out of the core and applications modules) There will be a need for summarizing what is in cvs (but also leocms). this should happen based on target groups (omroepen , governement, education , fun) . this is where more work is needed. This is something I can live with for the moment and would get my +1 (my next call of course will be to put a maven cvs on mmbase.org) _______________________________________________ Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
