Kees Jongenburger wrote: > > This vote does not aim to host full CMS-es such as WIAB or LEoCMS. These > > are too extensive to include in the applicatiosn CVS, and a separate > > solution should be found for these CMSes. > I think this is a bit wage. where to draw the line is mmbob too > extensive to include in the applications?
I think the idea is that it should be reuseable 'components'. It is a bit vague, but no matter, because a vote would be required. An argument for voting -1 would be that you find it not sufficiently a component. This argument will be valid then, because the 'rules' state that it should be. I can imagine that some-one else finds LeoCMS a framework, and therefore a reuseable component and therefore suitable for inclusion. If +3's can be found for this opinion, for all I care it is a component then. I myself would not know in this case because I don't know LeoCMS well enough and would probably simply abstain, and not form any burden, nor support. 'mmbob' would receive my +1 because i figure that fora are reusebable. So, consicely, IMHO a application is modular enough if +3 people can be found to find so... Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen mihxil' Mediacentrum 140 H'sum [] () +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US _______________________________________________ Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
