On Apr 18, 2005, at 11:22 AM, Pierre van Rooden wrote:
Due to possible confusion on the license issues with Jgroup jars, we can currently not allow the code in the core (though this may change in the future, if more clarity can be achieve with the exact requirements of the license). A such I cancel the vote in its current form.
Since most of us seem to believe that this code is useful and that it will most likely pass, the suggestion is to recast the vote but instead place the code in the contributions branche.
For this it is needed that the package name is changed and that a maintaining committer will be assigned.
I have asked Andre van Toly to arrange a maintaining committer.
As soon as I have received word on this, I will have the vote recast, and am confident that it will pass then.
So no new action from kennisnet is needed, we just need a name right ? and the vote count will continue (no new votes needed on
the +1) ?
Daniel.
_______________________________________________ Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
