On 4/18/05, Pierre van Rooden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Due to possible confusion on the license issues with Jgroup jars, we can > currently not allow the code in the core (though this may change in the > future, if more clarity can be achieve with the exact requirements of > the license). A such I cancel the vote in its current form. > > Since most of us seem to believe that this code is useful and that it > will most likely pass, the suggestion is to recast the vote but instead > place the code in the contributions branche.
I did not read that the code had to be stored in the core. I don't see why the vote should be canceld > For this it is needed that the package name is changed Why ? aselect doens't either _______________________________________________ Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
