I did not read that the code had to be stored in the core. I don't see why the vote should be canceled
I prefer to not have too much confusion. The current vote is confusing and doe snot specoify the controibutions module, and as such should be recast. It is a bit of a delay, but not much.
For this it is needed that the package name is changedWhy ? aselect doens't either
The package name of aselect is : org.mmbase.security.implementation.aselect which is a separate package
The current package name of de multicast proposal is: org.mmbase.module.core.change which is not.
I propose to change it into org.mmbase.module.core.change.jgroups or perhaps something like org.mmbase.messaging.jgroups
or something similar, and remove the 'JG' in the classnames as they are then not needed.
The last package idea is more because I think org.mmbase.module.core is a sucky package name, but YMMV.
-- Pierre van Rooden Mediapark, C 107 tel. +31 (0)35 6772815 "Anything worth doing is worth overdoing." _______________________________________________ Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
