> I'm not eager for another dependency. If we provide it, I think we > should really drop our own pool code completely. > If we don't drop our own code, we should not add another jar dependency. > It is ridiculous to have exactly the same thing twice, just differently > implemented. We do that all the time(images,email,lucenes), so this is a non argument. as long as the core doesn't get to much deps it's fine by me. _______________________________________________ Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
- Re: [Developers] CALL removin... André van Toly
- Re: [Developers] CALL removin... Kees Jongenburger
- Re: [Developers] CALL removin... Nico Klasens
- Re: [Developers] CALL removin... Pierre van Rooden
- [Developers] CALL removing jd... Kees Jongenburger
- Re: [Developers] CALL removin... Matthijs Wensveen
- Re: [Developers] CALL removin... Nico Klasens
- Re: [Developers] CALL removin... Michiel Meeuwissen
- Re: [Developers] CALL removin... Pierre van Rooden
- Re: [Developers] CALL removin... Michiel Meeuwissen
- Re: [Developers] CALL removin... Kees Jongenburger
- Re: [Developers] CALL removin... Michiel Meeuwissen
- Re: [Developers] CALL removin... Pierre van Rooden
- Re: [Developers] CALL removin... Kees Jongenburger
- Re: [Developers] CALL removin... Michiel Meeuwissen
- Re: [Developers] CALL removin... Kees Jongenburger
- Re: [Developers] CALL removin... Michiel Meeuwissen
- Re: [Developers] CALL removing jdbc moduile (org.mmbase... Pierre van Rooden
- Re: [Developers] CALL removing jdbc moduile (org.m... Kees Jongenburger
- Re: [Developers] CALL removing jdbc moduile (o... Pierre van Rooden
- Re: [Developers] CALL removing jdbc moduil... marcel maatkamp
