Cees Roele wrote:
Consequences of this narrow interpretation of responsibility are that one is
only responsible for code voted on when one had voting rights and possibly that
one cannot leave the community to pursue other interests.
IMO, the consequences are merely that, at the time of voting, the number
of people willing to maintain the code when needed determines whether,
at that time, it will bezome an application or a contribution. It is a
simple measure to ensure that if something is 'community-supported' that
there are, indeed, enough people to do so.
And if indeed, in the future it turns out there are no people
maintaining code, then we should, imo, seriously consider whether it is
still 'community supported'. Claiming it is maintained while it is in
truth not seems a lot worse to me.
The reverse is also the case, of course.
Gomez
_______________________________________________
Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
