On 4/11/06, André van Toly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Op 11-apr-2006, om 16:31 heeft Daniel Ockeloen het volgende geschreven: > > On Apr 11, 2006, at 4:15 PM, Nico Klasens wrote: > > > >> Daniel Ockeloen wrote: > >>> Hai, > >>> In the vote on principles it became clear that we lost the rules > >>> on what makes a contributions. To have something ive placed > >>> the following file in CVS (in the root of contributions). Please > >>> correct any language errors ive made in this fine and place > >>> comments on the dev-list if you don't agree (i am doing this > >>> from memory even google count not fine the rules anymore). > >> > >> Uhh, > >> google: MMBase 3rd Party > >> and the first hit is > >> http://www.mmbase.org/mmdocs18/3rdparty.html > > > > well i asked 4 developers on irc (all commitors) and they didn't > > know. The document is not very clear either that we are talking > > about the contributions cvs. If these are the rules fine but then > > i don't really see how for example the lucene got abstrain votes. > > > > we need to make this more clear im a commitor and i didn't get it. > > I want to share things i make with others and this is not helping. > > I believe the confusion on irc was about 'contributions' and > 'applications'. The term 3rd Party packages maybe another one that > adds to the confusion :-) allthough the document Nico refers to is > quite clear that is neither a community application nor a contribution.
The document also states this about the license: All code submitted must follow the MPL. This may change later, but we want a discussion on licenses before that will happen. This doesn't match the document from daniel _______________________________________________ Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
