Daniel Ockeloen wrote:
On Apr 11, 2006, at 5:15 PM, Nico Klasens wrote:
André van Toly wrote:
-1: it is NOT suitable
0: it might be suitable
+1: it is suitable
Nico
Thanks Nico, i hope you don't mind i added the readme ill update and
link it. One thing i really don't like is the gray areas in these
rules, I want rules
that are so clear a +1 can be expected if you follow them. Only if we
feel its 'important' and 'maintained by all' we should have a deeper
discussion and
move it from contributions to applications.
We must not forget that contributions are done by people who would like
to share what they have made in the hope it will help someone. In
return they will get a 'free' cvs system to make working and sharing
easer.
Quoted from the document "A 3rd party package should be useful for
others. A package which is highly customized for one person is in most
cases not interesting for others. This is very vague, but you can
probably judge better if it should be shared then we, as community, can."
I don't think we should have very hard rules to guarantee a +1. This CVS
module is created to make it EASIER for outsiders to contribute. The
vote is just to ask the core committors if they think it is in the
boundaries of these vague rules.
An abstain can also mean that you don't have enough information to judge
that, but don't want to be in the way to let the vote pass. Other
committors may have the required information to judge. If the vote
didn't pass, because all abstained then the next step is to explain more
why you think it is suitable.
Nico
_______________________________________________
Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
