André van Toly wrote:
Op 11-apr-2006, om 16:31 heeft Daniel Ockeloen het volgende geschreven:
On Apr 11, 2006, at 4:15 PM, Nico Klasens wrote:
Daniel Ockeloen wrote:
Hai,
In the vote on principles it became clear that we lost the rules
on what makes a contributions. To have something ive placed
the following file in CVS (in the root of contributions). Please
correct any language errors ive made in this fine and place
comments on the dev-list if you don't agree (i am doing this from
memory even google count not fine the rules anymore).
Uhh,
google: MMBase 3rd Party
and the first hit is
http://www.mmbase.org/mmdocs18/3rdparty.html
well i asked 4 developers on irc (all commitors) and they didn't
know. The document is not very clear either that we are talking
about the contributions cvs. If these are the rules fine but then i
don't really see how for example the lucene got abstrain votes.
we need to make this more clear im a commitor and i didn't get it. I
want to share things i make with others and this is not helping.
I believe the confusion on irc was about 'contributions' and
'applications'. The term 3rd Party packages maybe another one that adds
to the confusion :-) allthough the document Nico refers to is quite
clear that is neither a community application nor a contribution.
---André
See http://lists.mmbase.org/arc/developers/msg11785.html
Later in the thread it has been decided to call the CVS module
'Contributions'. iow contribution == 3rd Party packages
Later in time, I tried to start a discussion what is suitable for this
CVS module, but never had a clear anwser. So everything which is not
community maintianed is eligible for proposal in this CVS module. Core
committors decide if it is suitable.
-1: it is NOT suitable
0: it might be suitable
+1: it is suitable
Nico
_______________________________________________
Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
