On Oct 12, 2016, at 07:03 PM, Oliver Grawert wrote: >yes, exactly
Thanks for the confirmation. >... and i'd be happy with either a --padding option (the 'fudge factor' as >steve called it) or a --size option that would define the actual final img >size. > >the first one puts the math on me, the second means you need to do the >calculation. > >the latter is indeed a lot more user friendly but i'd even be happy >with the first one for now which is trivial to implement (you could >just extend my WIGGLEROOM patch by a proper cmdline option)... I think I want to do it differently (plus, I need tests) and I want to support the size option, not padding. Cheers, -Barry
pgpSci6k2DY_8.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Devices mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.snapcraft.io/mailman/listinfo/devices
