On Oct 12, 2016, at 07:03 PM, Oliver Grawert wrote:

>yes, exactly

Thanks for the confirmation.

>... and i'd be happy with either a --padding option (the 'fudge factor' as
>steve called it) or a --size option that would define the actual final img
>the first one puts the math on me, the second means you need to do the
>the latter is indeed a lot more user friendly but i'd even be happy
>with the first one for now which is trivial to implement (you could
>just extend my WIGGLEROOM patch by a proper cmdline option)...

I think I want to do it differently (plus, I need tests) and I want to support
the size option, not padding.


Attachment: pgpSci6k2DY_8.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Devices mailing list
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 

Reply via email to