--- Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 06:52:13PM -0700, Martin Good point. The term is "on the balance of probabilities". That scares me - I wonder what sort of probability courts would accept for civil cases (if they even know what the word probability means, which is by no means certain in english courts!).
50% in a civil trial. If I can prove that you "more likely than not" stole 100USD from me in a
civil trial you'll owe me 100USD. I may not be able to get you sent to jail, but I can get my
money.
Yeah that scares me too.
Would it not be better for deniability if splitfiles were routed and cached under one meta key (with a suffix for part number)? Then, whoever requested the split file would naturally go to the best node for that key to get all the parts, and it would be commonplace for any node en route to deal with all the parts. Perhaps this has some disadvantages from the POV of distributing and storing files, but would seem to help the plausible deniability side of things.
--
Roger Hayter
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
