>>>> Good point. The term is "on the balance of probabilities". That scares >>>> me - I wonder what sort of probability courts would accept for civil >>>> cases (if they even know what the word probability means, which is by no >>>> means certain in english courts!). >>> >>> >>> 50% in a civil trial. If I can prove that you "more likely than not" >>> stole 100USD from me in a >>> civil trial you'll owe me 100USD. I may not be able to get you sent >>> to jail, but I can get my >>> money. >>> >>> Yeah that scares me too. >>> >> >> Would it not be better for deniability if splitfiles were routed and >> cached under one meta key (with a suffix for part number)? Then, >> whoever requested the split file would naturally go to the best node for >> that key to get all the parts, and it would be commonplace for any node >> en route to deal with all the parts. Perhaps this has some >> disadvantages from the POV of distributing and storing files, but would >> seem to help the plausible deniability side of things. > >I don't think that's necessary. Fish's and panamerica's "I was framed!" >idea is a pretty great defense. Read those recent posts.
actually it was not meant as a defence but as an ATTACK to get someone jailed because the victim will have a hard time convicing the court the bad content has been injected into his/her node and not requested by him/her him-/herself ! _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
