On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 07:43:47PM -0700, Martin Stone Davis wrote: > Brandon Low wrote: > > >Good point. I'm never against increased anonymity, I was only arguing > >with you because I feel that things like this are currently not as > >important as getting freenet 'working', because they aren't an exploit > >that allows someone to completely exploit freenet and findout exactly > >what I've been downloading with it... > > Certainly! Getting it working is the top priority. As far as how easy > it is to exploit freenet, it would be nice to know how difficult it is > currently to successfully mount the timing attack I mentioned.
Pretty trivial to find out what is in somebody's datastore. A bit harder to establish a good chance that they have a given splitfile. > > -Martin -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
