I know I've not comment or contributed in some time now, but I just have
some comments on this.

On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Matthew Toseland <mj...@cam.ac.uk> wrote:

> On 16/11/14 17:50, Ian wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Matthew Toseland <mj...@cam.ac.uk>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 16/11/14 16:36, Ian Clarke wrote:
> >>> We're in an interesting situation.  The world finally appears to really
> >>> care about the things that Freenet has been about from the very
> >> beginning a
> >>> decade and a half ago (most of the publicity back then viewed Freenet
> >>> through the prism of Napster and copyright infringement).  People
> finally
> >>> care about anonymity, privacy, government monitoring, etc.  We should
> be
> >>> able to capitalize on this but it will take work.
> >
> >> And in the meantime every wannabe clone project gets all the funding,
> >> and we don't, because we're old news. Yeah.
> >>
> > I don't think it's because we're old news, although I think that's a
> > perception challenge we need to address.  I think it's because we really
> > haven't been making much of an effort to market ourselves.  In the past
> > journalists came to us, and I was fairly good at communicating with them
> on
> > the project's behalf, but we can't rely on organic press interest any
> more,
> > we need to make an effort to reach out.
> >
> > For example, we should be perfect for a kickstarter project, we just need
> > to do it, and do it to a high standard (good message, good quality video,
> > etc).
> Is it actually possible to do a Kickstarter-or-one-of-its-competitors
> project if you are a social network (therefore banned from Kickstarter)
> with no physical goodies to give to donors and no intention of making a
> profit?
>

Freenet as darknet might technically be referred to as a social network,
but not in the commonly known sense.

Physical goodies can be a low power freenet node to run, since freenet is
ideal in 24/7 conditions anyway.

I am worried about competition from maidsafe, who is a business that claims
to offer everything freenet does with the ability to farm. We need to
differentiate from or beat them, IMO.

That's all, thanks.


> > I need to do a bit of research before responding to the rest of your
> email,
> > since I've been out-of-the-loop also (except for various administrative
> > tasks).
> >
> > Ian.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devl mailing list
> Devl@freenetproject.org
> https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to