> One that you forgot is "relative navigability." That is, currently, I
> can have an HTML document at:

> Lastly, I'd like to note that we have a toddler industry in Freenet
> Web sites. Massacring these innocents with Yet Another Gee Whiz
> re-design is stupid and irresponsible. In other words, it better have
> a bigger payoff than just satisfying what someone's idea of an elegant
> URI would look like.

I designed my proposed URI changes to take these concerns into
account. Relative links work as before and it's backwards compatible with
the old URIs. It just adds the option of encoding key-related information
in the URI.



_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
>From - Tue Apr 17 01:41:47 2001
Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org>
Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11])
        by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA04820
        for <danello at danky.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 16:10:37 -0400
Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id B2BA25801A; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 12:52:06 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: devl at freenetproject.org
Received: by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix, from userid 500)
        id 5760B57D97; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 12:51:59 -0700 (PDT)
To: devl at freenetproject.org
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Docs
Message-ID: <20010416125159.A26452 at freenetproject.org>
References: <20010416120841.B1104 at linuxpower.org> <20010416121054.H22926 at 
freenetproject.org> <20010416203809.C1965 at linuxpower.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;

Reply via email to