It would be reasonably easy (a few hours' work) to support Internet Explorer reasonably safely. (By recognizing it, and transforming text/plain into <pre>'ed and HTML-encoded HTML). Good idea or not? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20061205/4dd7b7c1/attachment.pgp>
- [freenet-dev] IE support: good or bad? toad
- [freenet-dev] IE support: good or bad? Dave Baker
- [freenet-dev] IE support: good or bad? Dennis Olsson
- [freenet-dev] IE support: good or bad? toad
- [freenet-dev] IE support: good or bad? Dave Baker