On Tuesday 05 December 2006 01:58, toad wrote: > It would be reasonably easy (a few hours' work) to support Internet > Explorer reasonably safely. (By recognizing it, and transforming > text/plain into <pre>'ed and HTML-encoded HTML).
Although that doesn't make all the themes work in IE! That's one more thing to consider, albeit comparitively minor. > Good idea or not? But yes, in principle, the idea of supporting IE safely is definately a good thing.