On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 08:59:36AM +0000, Dave Baker wrote: > On Tuesday 05 December 2006 01:58, toad wrote: > > It would be reasonably easy (a few hours' work) to support Internet > > Explorer reasonably safely. (By recognizing it, and transforming > > text/plain into <pre>'ed and HTML-encoded HTML). > > Although that doesn't make all the themes work in IE! That's one more thing > to > consider, albeit comparitively minor.
Themes? > > > Good idea or not? > > But yes, in principle, the idea of supporting IE safely is definately a good > thing. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20061205/57d81cb6/attachment.pgp>
