On Tuesday 05 December 2006 13:48, toad wrote: > On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 08:59:36AM +0000, Dave Baker wrote: > > On Tuesday 05 December 2006 01:58, toad wrote: > > > It would be reasonably easy (a few hours' work) to support Internet > > > Explorer reasonably safely. (By recognizing it, and transforming > > > text/plain into <pre>'ed and HTML-encoded HTML). > > > > Although that doesn't make all the themes work in IE! That's one more > > thing to consider, albeit comparitively minor. > > Themes?
The FProxy stlesheets - I know that at least sky is quite broken in IE. > > > > Good idea or not? > > > > But yes, in principle, the idea of supporting IE safely is definately a > > good thing.
