On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 10:36:44AM +0100, Dennis Olsson wrote: > Do we want to let freenet give non-standardized results?
Well, the proposal is to text2html only when talking to dangerous browsers. For all other browsers the only transformation that will occur is adding a newline at the beginning if a text file looks like RSS. > > I'm not generally opposed to supporting IE, since it seems to me like it's > a step in the wrong direction. If it doesn't support the standards, let it > punish itself. The downside is that it in the end only punishes freenet, > which is bad. > > This would be a nice thing to have as a plugin, distributed with the node, > but I'm not sure of the status of the new plugin system bombe is/was > working on. > > If this is going to be implemented in the node in the end, I suggest a new > flag. use for instance "?text2html" as the end of an URL it's forwarded > to. That way it's not _that_ much leaving the standard. > > // (the more or less idle) Dennis (cyberdo) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20061205/12c3d725/attachment.pgp>
