On Thursday 04 June 2009 17:08:22 Ian Clarke wrote: > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Matthew Toseland > <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: > > What bug tracker should we use? Trac? Jira? Lighthouse? Something else? > > I vote for lighthouse. I've used Mantis, Trac, and Fogbugz, and > Lighthouse is better than all. It is simple, user friendly, doesn't > impose any particular way of working, and it has a flexible API.
How is it different to Mantis then? Anyone else have an opinion? Is there any chance of importing our existing bugs into Lighthouse? > > Ian. > > > 4. The wikis. > > > > We have a French wiki using MediaWiki and an English wiki using Wikka. It > > is highly unlikely we will find anywhere, free or otherwise, that hosts > > managed Wikka, so we will probably have to convert it to MediaWiki - or > > start again. Again, IMHO it is important to keep existing content as not > > doing so results in significant new work having to be done. > > Probably best to go with whatever is the most standard, which is > probably MediaWiki (that is the Wikipedia one, right?). Agreed. Hopefully importing won't be a big problem... > > Ian. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090604/a055a9d5/attachment.pgp>
