On Friday 05 June 2009 00:59:09 Daniel Cheng wrote: > On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:02 AM, Matthew > Toseland<toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: > > On Thursday 04 June 2009 17:08:22 Ian Clarke wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Matthew Toseland > >> <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: > >> > What bug tracker should we use? Trac? Jira? Lighthouse? Something else? > >> > >> I vote for ?lighthouse. ?I've used Mantis, Trac, and Fogbugz, and > >> Lighthouse is better than all. ?It is simple, user friendly, doesn't > >> impose any particular way of working, and it has a flexible API. > > > > How is it different to Mantis then? > > > > Anyone else have an opinion? > > > > Is there any chance of importing our existing bugs into Lighthouse? > >> > > Does lighthouse have "related bugs" or other duplicated bugs fields?
Or freeform HTML into which these could be converted, as with Trac? > > [...] Other important features? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090605/a7e6c7fe/attachment.pgp>
