On Thursday, 4. June 2009 20:02:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > I vote for lighthouse. I've used Mantis, Trac, and Fogbugz, and
> > Lighthouse is better than all. It is simple, user friendly, doesn't
> > impose any particular way of working, and it has a flexible API.
>
> How is it different to Mantis then?
>
> Anyone else have an opinion?
Is it free? (I couldn't get that information from my first glance on the site)
If it is unfree, it doesn't look suitable as bugtracker for a censorship free
network to me.
Proprietary solutions allow censorship *by design*, because some specific
entity controls what the system does - no matter how benevolent that entity
might be at the moment.
I already had that feeling about uservoice, but there I though "oh well, it's
not really integral for freenet". But the bugtracker is integral, and relying
on a proprietary solution for an integral part of freenet is dangerous.
Best wishes,
Arne
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
- singing a part of the history of free software -
http://infinite-hands.draketo.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090605/18e45768/attachment.pgp>
