On Friday 05 June 2009 23:43:12 Ian Clarke wrote: > On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Matthew > Toseland<toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: > > On Friday 05 June 2009 07:54:08 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > >> On Thursday, 4. June 2009 20:02:13 Matthew Toseland wrote: > >> > > I vote for ?lighthouse. ?I've used Mantis, Trac, and Fogbugz, and > >> > > Lighthouse is better than all. ?It is simple, user friendly, doesn't > >> > > impose any particular way of working, and it has a flexible API. > >> > > >> > How is it different to Mantis then? > >> > > >> > Anyone else have an opinion? > >> > >> Is it free? (I couldn't get that information from my first glance on the > >> site) > > > > No. :| > > Yes it is, its free for open source projects, see > http://sera.lighthouseapp.com/plans
That is definitely not what he meant! > > If it is unfree, it doesn't look suitable as bugtracker for a censorship free > network to me. > > Proprietary solutions allow censorship *by design*, because some specific > entity controls what the system does - no matter how benevolent that entity > might be at the moment. > > I already had that feeling about uservoice, but there I though "oh well, it's > not really integral for freenet". But the bugtracker is integral, and relying > on a proprietary solution for an integral part of freenet is dangerous. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090606/90077f46/attachment.pgp>
