On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 10:55 AM Freenet304987 <freenet304...@proton.me> wrote:
> Ian Clarke <i...@freenetproject.org> wrote: > That's fine. > But you absolutely do **not** have to steal the name of an existing > software for that. > The name - which I came up with - never belonged to one codebase, it belonged to the mission. This was the case from the beginning, which is precisely why our mission statement didn't mention any specific implementation. > Millions of software projects were able to come up with a unique > and good name, so can you. > I did, 24 years ago. > You say you're against technology being a force of oppression. > And you do that in the same thread where you're trying to oppress > the people who have been running your software project for > decades, for free. > Don't be silly, me not doing what you think I should do isn't "oppression". > This is beyond ungrateful. > It is utterly vile and you should be ashamed. > I'm happy to hear different perspectives, but this melodramatic language helps nobody. Ian. -- Ian Clarke Founder, The Freenet Project Email: i...@freenetproject.org
