Jean-Vincent Drean wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm not a big fan of step wizards thus I'm more into proposal 3. See
>> other comments below.
>>
>> The user would be forced to use the mouse in order to see the preview.
> 
> Yes and I don't see how it could be different in proposals 3) and 4),
> displaying images in the tree ?

I was thinking about navigating the tree using the keyboard. This is a 
nice thing to have. It can be done in both proposal 3 and 4.

> 
>>> - as a user I prefer to see all options to understand where I'll find
>>>> the feature I'm looking for
>>> s/user/power user/
>> The WYSIWYG addresses power users also.
>>
> 
> I'm just saying that Vincent is not exactly the average user here :)
> 
>>>> - it's one click less
>>> IMHO an extra click is only a problem if the user has to think where
>>> to click and why to click.
>>> I agree that 2 or more extra clicks are a problem but only one, with
>>> the action button always at the very same place, no.
>> What I find sometimes annoying is going back and forth through a wizard.
>> I admit a wizard fills more secure the first few times it's being used,
> 
> See ! :)
> 
>> but for me it can get annoying the more I'm using it.
> 
> Of course having a wizard with a lot of mandatory steps would be a
> pain but there's only 2 of them here.
> 
> There's a "pro" I have forgotten in the list :
> Having those 2 steps is a good thing considering that we'll use the
> same dialog for insertion / deletion. When you'll edit a
> link/image/etc you'll first see the options dialog and won't have to
> load/see the wiki tree. Of course you'll be able to go back to the
> first step but in most of the cases (imo) you won't have to.
> 
> JV.
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to