Marius Dumitru Florea a écrit :
> Jean-Vincent Drean wrote:
>   
>> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>     
>>> I'm not a big fan of step wizards thus I'm more into proposal 3. See
>>> other comments below.
>>>
>>> The user would be forced to use the mouse in order to see the preview.
>>>       
>> Yes and I don't see how it could be different in proposals 3) and 4),
>> displaying images in the tree ?
>>     
>
> I was thinking about navigating the tree using the keyboard. This is a 
> nice thing to have. It can be done in both proposal 3 and 4.
>   

Yes, clearly Marius.

I'm +1 for proposition 4 ) since it's, for me, a good evolution of the 
proposition 3)

Thomas

>   
>>>> - as a user I prefer to see all options to understand where I'll find
>>>>         
>>>>> the feature I'm looking for
>>>>>           
>>>> s/user/power user/
>>>>         
>>> The WYSIWYG addresses power users also.
>>>
>>>       
>> I'm just saying that Vincent is not exactly the average user here :)
>>
>>     
>>>>> - it's one click less
>>>>>           
>>>> IMHO an extra click is only a problem if the user has to think where
>>>> to click and why to click.
>>>> I agree that 2 or more extra clicks are a problem but only one, with
>>>> the action button always at the very same place, no.
>>>>         
>>> What I find sometimes annoying is going back and forth through a wizard.
>>> I admit a wizard fills more secure the first few times it's being used,
>>>       
>> See ! :)
>>
>>     
>>> but for me it can get annoying the more I'm using it.
>>>       
>> Of course having a wizard with a lot of mandatory steps would be a
>> pain but there's only 2 of them here.
>>
>> There's a "pro" I have forgotten in the list :
>> Having those 2 steps is a good thing considering that we'll use the
>> same dialog for insertion / deletion. When you'll edit a
>> link/image/etc you'll first see the options dialog and won't have to
>> load/see the wiki tree. Of course you'll be able to go back to the
>> first step but in most of the cases (imo) you won't have to.
>>
>> JV.
>> _______________________________________________
>> devs mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>   

_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to