Hi, On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote:
> Vincent Massol wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Let's vote on how to handle the title behavior for the 2.0 final > > release so that we're all on the same page. > > Here's what Mediawiki (on Wikipedia) does: > > - the document title is displayed using a h1 id=firstHeading > - the content allows using =titles=, which generate h1 > - by a natural process, contributors rarely use =titles= in documents > This is sort of a convention: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/MediaWiki_User_Guide/Sections_and_Headings "Do not use headings of level 1, such as "=Title="; start with level 2 instead. The heading at level 1 is used for the title of the page." just fyi. - Asiri > > So I continue to think that we should allow users to enter = titles, and > they should generate h1. There is no rule against a document having more > than one h1. Again, the document title is in the <title> element, not in > the <h1> element. > > > After talking to several people here's what I propose: > > > > 1) We remove the top level H1 only if the title compat flag is on and > > the title H1 is the same as the top level H1 > > 2) The compat flag is off by default in our distributions > > 3) We modify the Toucan and Albatross skins to display the title (same > > as Colibri) > > 4) We modify the Default XE XAR to have titles for all its pages (and > > remove the header 1 in page content) > > What happens with dynamic titles? > > > This should cover both user upgrades and new behavior. Note that user > > custom skin will still work in most cases since they're not normally > > touching the contentview.vm file. > > -- > Sergiu Dumitriu > http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
