On Sep 9, 2009, at 5:48 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: > Vincent Massol wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Let's vote on how to handle the title behavior for the 2.0 final >> release so that we're all on the same page. > > Here's what Mediawiki (on Wikipedia) does: > > - the document title is displayed using a h1 id=firstHeading > - the content allows using =titles=, which generate h1 > - by a natural process, contributors rarely use =titles= in documents > > So I continue to think that we should allow users to enter = titles, > and > they should generate h1. There is no rule against a document having > more > than one h1. Again, the document title is in the <title> element, > not in > the <h1> element.
How does that contradict any of the 4 points below? >> After talking to several people here's what I propose: >> >> 1) We remove the top level H1 only if the title compat flag is on and >> the title H1 is the same as the top level H1 >> 2) The compat flag is off by default in our distributions >> 3) We modify the Toucan and Albatross skins to display the title >> (same >> as Colibri) >> 4) We modify the Default XE XAR to have titles for all its pages (and >> remove the header 1 in page content) > > What happens with dynamic titles? They'll get generated from the content since the title would be empty for pages with dynamic titles. See Denis's proposal and my answer to it. It doesn't change any of the 4 points mentioned above AFAICS. Thanks -Vincent >> This should cover both user upgrades and new behavior. Note that user >> custom skin will still work in most cases since they're not normally >> touching the contentview.vm file. _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
