Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: > Vincent Massol wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Let's vote on how to handle the title behavior for the 2.0 final >> release so that we're all on the same page. > > Here's what Mediawiki (on Wikipedia) does: > > - the document title is displayed using a h1 id=firstHeading > - the content allows using =titles=, which generate h1 > - by a natural process, contributors rarely use =titles= in documents > > So I continue to think that we should allow users to enter = titles, and > they should generate h1. There is no rule against a document having more > than one h1. Again, the document title is in the <title> element, not in > the <h1> element.
true, and this means that we could have the title displayed in a page in anything (<div>), doesn't necessarily have to be semantic, since its semantic is given by its use in the <title>. Normally, from the semantic pov, we should leave it only in title, but it's just that we need to emphasize it for the user. Why would we put it in a h1 then? Thanks, Anca > >> After talking to several people here's what I propose: >> >> 1) We remove the top level H1 only if the title compat flag is on and >> the title H1 is the same as the top level H1 >> 2) The compat flag is off by default in our distributions >> 3) We modify the Toucan and Albatross skins to display the title (same >> as Colibri) >> 4) We modify the Default XE XAR to have titles for all its pages (and >> remove the header 1 in page content) > > What happens with dynamic titles? > >> This should cover both user upgrades and new behavior. Note that user >> custom skin will still work in most cases since they're not normally >> touching the contentview.vm file. > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
