+1 for integrating templates.

"Article" is like a blog post man while "Encyclopedia" integrates a table
on the right to describe an object or something. Their objective are
different. But if we decide to keep only one of them, I would be OK
(Encyclopedia being my favorite).

2016-07-12 13:55 GMT+02:00 Vincent Massol <[email protected]>:

>
> > On 12 Jul 2016, at 13:48, Eduard Moraru <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Ideally we should make the templates independent and have a dedicated
> >> section in e.x.o.
> >> Users could browse and install them separate.
> >>
> >> We should also monitor what templates are interesting and which are not
> >> (although this is a bit hard to do right now).
> >>
> >> Of course I also consider we could have better templates or diverse, but
> >> this is not the point now.
> >> The point is to add some templates and better show this feature. Since
> we
> >> are very generic it's hard to tell what templates each category of users
> >> would need. That's why it would be better for them to select them, but
> they
> >> should be aware that they have this possibility.
> >>
> >> So currently the vote is favorable. I'm waiting until tomorrow so see
> if we
> >> have any blockers.
> >>
> >> Still not sure about how we should implement them best: in platform or
> in
> >> e.x.o? As a package or separate?
> >>
> >
> > My preference goes towards a templates package, for start, in contrib,
> that
> > is included in the default flavor.
>
> I think I agree. We need to close the last discussion thread about the
> scope for the xwiki github org and about platform. Right now the consensus
> seems to be:
> * the default platform distribution’s goal is to provide a basic working
> wiki
> * XE’s goal (and in the future another named flavor) is to provide a
> full-fledged second generation wiki.
> * Non core features go in contrib and generic ones are included in the XE
> flavor
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
> > Thanks,
> > Eduard
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Caty
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Eduard Moraru <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> +1, generally.
> >>>
> >>> I also feel a bit frustrated by the seeming redundancy of having both
> >>> Article and Encyclopedia on one side and Meeting Report and Simple page
> >>> onthe other, since from a helicopter view they are 95% identical.
> >> However,
> >>> I believe that the whole point of templates is to have a very
> specialized
> >>> usecase that is answered and that the user can immediately use. If
> every
> >>> time someone wants a simple page, but selects meeting notes and
> removes a
> >>> lot of formatting, then they will just end up creating a simple page
> >>> template.
> >>>
> >>> These are just a couple of usages that we consider to be very common
> and
> >>> which we decide to offer some help by default (in the default flavor).
> >>> Others could be added (even from Caty`s extended list), since we`re
> >> missing
> >>> tables, macros and many other useful XWiki features that are otherwise
> >> hard
> >>> to discover.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Eduard
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Alexandru Cotiuga <
> >>> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>> + 1 for all
> >>>> The difference between Article and Encyclopedia could be increased by
> >>>> adding other specific elements on each one's layout.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Alex
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
> >>>> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> In case we don't like a particular Template, then the best strategy
> >> is
> >>> to
> >>>>> have individual votes for them.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> @Anca, from your feedback is hard to know if you prefer Article over
> >>>>> Encyclopedia.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Since we need to release 8.2 final at the end of the week I would
> >> like
> >>> to
> >>>>> advance with this topic: either by committing all the proposed
> >>> templates
> >>>> or
> >>>>> just a subset, but I need more opinions.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Status:
> >>>>> 1. Article (Article page): +1 Vincent, +1 Caty
> >>>>> 2. Encyclopedia (Encyclopedia page): +1 Vincent, +1 Caty
> >>>>> 3. Meeting Report (Agenda and notes): 1+ Vincent, +1 Caty, +1 Anca
> >>>>> 4. Simple Page (With table of content): +1 Vincent, +1 Caty, +1 Anca
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Caty
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Anca Luca <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
> >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Anca Luca <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hello Caty,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
> >>>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> By default there are not many page templates an user could
> >> see.
> >>>>>>>>> In order for users to understand the power and purpose of
> >>> XWiki,
> >>>> it
> >>>>>>> would
> >>>>>>>>> be helpful to add more content templates by default.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Content Templates are templates that don't belong to a
> >>> particular
> >>>>>>>>> application, but provides an initial content structure. The
> >>>>> templates
> >>>>>>>> will
> >>>>>>>>> be suggested in the creation step.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Here are some templates we could add by default:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/TemplatesDefault#HProposal
> >>>>>>>>> 1. Article
> >>>>>>>>> 2. Encyclopedia
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I think these two are the same one, they should be collapsed
> >> into
> >>>>> only
> >>>>>>> one
> >>>>>>>> template. I don't really understand the differences between
> >> these
> >>>>> two.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The differences are in layout.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> In my opinion this is not enough to have both of them. For me, the
> >>> goal
> >>>>> of
> >>>>>> the templates by default is to help discover the template feature
> >> and
> >>>> its
> >>>>>> benefits to users, and the way to do that would be to show
> >>> interesting
> >>>>>> usecases of the template feature. Having two templates for the same
> >>>>> usecase
> >>>>>> but with different layout is not aligned with this goal, but would
> >> be
> >>>>> more
> >>>>>> aligned with the goal of showing that we can do different fancy
> >>>> layouts.
> >>>>> In
> >>>>>> addition, this logic would allow to have multiple templates for the
> >>>> other
> >>>>>> usecases as well, with different layout, which would not be a good
> >>> idea
> >>>>>> (e.g. another meeting report, with a different layout) because
> >> would
> >>>>> bloat
> >>>>>> the list...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Anyone else?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Anca
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> 3. Meeting
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Should be called Meeting Report (or meeting notes), so that the
> >>>>>>> difference
> >>>>>>>> with the meeting extension is more obvious.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I will use "Meeting Report"
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> 4. Simple Page
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Should have the word Table of Contents in the name, so that its
> >>>>> purpose
> >>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>> obvious from the start (otherwise "simple page" and the default
> >>>>> "blank
> >>>>>>>> page" are not very easy to differentiate ).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The difference is viewed in the Description, see
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Proposal/TemplatesDefault/WebHome/descriptions.png
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>> Caty
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Another template could be added, "Index page", with a simple
> >>>>> livetable
> >>>>>>>> listing all the children (and descendants) pages of the current
> >>>> page.
> >>>>>>> It's
> >>>>>>>> handy when creating the root page of a subtree on the wiki
> >> (would
> >>>>> have
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> same purpose as "Dashboard", to be a scripted homepage from
> >> where
> >>>> the
> >>>>>>>> subtree of that page can be accessed).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>> Anca
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> You can test them on
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>> http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/TemplatesDefault/
> >>>>>> (use
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> Create button)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Please vote if you agree these templates should be added by
> >>>> default
> >>>>>> or
> >>>>>>>>> otherwise let me know your feedback.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>> Caty
> >>>>>>>>> _________
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>



-- 
Guillaume Delhumeau ([email protected])
Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
Committer on the XWiki.org project
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to