Thanks for your votes.

I've added them in http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XE-1564

Thanks,
Caty

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Guillaume Delhumeau <
[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 for integrating templates.
>
> "Article" is like a blog post man while "Encyclopedia" integrates a table
> on the right to describe an object or something. Their objective are
> different. But if we decide to keep only one of them, I would be OK
> (Encyclopedia being my favorite).
>
> 2016-07-12 13:55 GMT+02:00 Vincent Massol <[email protected]>:
>
> >
> > > On 12 Jul 2016, at 13:48, Eduard Moraru <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
> > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Ideally we should make the templates independent and have a dedicated
> > >> section in e.x.o.
> > >> Users could browse and install them separate.
> > >>
> > >> We should also monitor what templates are interesting and which are
> not
> > >> (although this is a bit hard to do right now).
> > >>
> > >> Of course I also consider we could have better templates or diverse,
> but
> > >> this is not the point now.
> > >> The point is to add some templates and better show this feature. Since
> > we
> > >> are very generic it's hard to tell what templates each category of
> users
> > >> would need. That's why it would be better for them to select them, but
> > they
> > >> should be aware that they have this possibility.
> > >>
> > >> So currently the vote is favorable. I'm waiting until tomorrow so see
> > if we
> > >> have any blockers.
> > >>
> > >> Still not sure about how we should implement them best: in platform or
> > in
> > >> e.x.o? As a package or separate?
> > >>
> > >
> > > My preference goes towards a templates package, for start, in contrib,
> > that
> > > is included in the default flavor.
> >
> > I think I agree. We need to close the last discussion thread about the
> > scope for the xwiki github org and about platform. Right now the
> consensus
> > seems to be:
> > * the default platform distribution’s goal is to provide a basic working
> > wiki
> > * XE’s goal (and in the future another named flavor) is to provide a
> > full-fledged second generation wiki.
> > * Non core features go in contrib and generic ones are included in the XE
> > flavor
> >
> > Thanks
> > -Vincent
> >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Eduard
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Caty
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Eduard Moraru <[email protected]
> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> +1, generally.
> > >>>
> > >>> I also feel a bit frustrated by the seeming redundancy of having both
> > >>> Article and Encyclopedia on one side and Meeting Report and Simple
> page
> > >>> onthe other, since from a helicopter view they are 95% identical.
> > >> However,
> > >>> I believe that the whole point of templates is to have a very
> > specialized
> > >>> usecase that is answered and that the user can immediately use. If
> > every
> > >>> time someone wants a simple page, but selects meeting notes and
> > removes a
> > >>> lot of formatting, then they will just end up creating a simple page
> > >>> template.
> > >>>
> > >>> These are just a couple of usages that we consider to be very common
> > and
> > >>> which we decide to offer some help by default (in the default
> flavor).
> > >>> Others could be added (even from Caty`s extended list), since we`re
> > >> missing
> > >>> tables, macros and many other useful XWiki features that are
> otherwise
> > >> hard
> > >>> to discover.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Eduard
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Alexandru Cotiuga <
> > >>> [email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hello,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> + 1 for all
> > >>>> The difference between Article and Encyclopedia could be increased
> by
> > >>>> adding other specific elements on each one's layout.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks,
> > >>>> Alex
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
> > >>>> [email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> In case we don't like a particular Template, then the best strategy
> > >> is
> > >>> to
> > >>>>> have individual votes for them.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> @Anca, from your feedback is hard to know if you prefer Article
> over
> > >>>>> Encyclopedia.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Since we need to release 8.2 final at the end of the week I would
> > >> like
> > >>> to
> > >>>>> advance with this topic: either by committing all the proposed
> > >>> templates
> > >>>> or
> > >>>>> just a subset, but I need more opinions.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Status:
> > >>>>> 1. Article (Article page): +1 Vincent, +1 Caty
> > >>>>> 2. Encyclopedia (Encyclopedia page): +1 Vincent, +1 Caty
> > >>>>> 3. Meeting Report (Agenda and notes): 1+ Vincent, +1 Caty, +1 Anca
> > >>>>> 4. Simple Page (With table of content): +1 Vincent, +1 Caty, +1
> Anca
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>> Caty
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Anca Luca <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
> > >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Anca Luca <[email protected]>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Hello Caty,
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
> > >>>>>>>> [email protected]
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> By default there are not many page templates an user could
> > >> see.
> > >>>>>>>>> In order for users to understand the power and purpose of
> > >>> XWiki,
> > >>>> it
> > >>>>>>> would
> > >>>>>>>>> be helpful to add more content templates by default.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Content Templates are templates that don't belong to a
> > >>> particular
> > >>>>>>>>> application, but provides an initial content structure. The
> > >>>>> templates
> > >>>>>>>> will
> > >>>>>>>>> be suggested in the creation step.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Here are some templates we could add by default:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/TemplatesDefault#HProposal
> > >>>>>>>>> 1. Article
> > >>>>>>>>> 2. Encyclopedia
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> I think these two are the same one, they should be collapsed
> > >> into
> > >>>>> only
> > >>>>>>> one
> > >>>>>>>> template. I don't really understand the differences between
> > >> these
> > >>>>> two.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> The differences are in layout.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> In my opinion this is not enough to have both of them. For me, the
> > >>> goal
> > >>>>> of
> > >>>>>> the templates by default is to help discover the template feature
> > >> and
> > >>>> its
> > >>>>>> benefits to users, and the way to do that would be to show
> > >>> interesting
> > >>>>>> usecases of the template feature. Having two templates for the
> same
> > >>>>> usecase
> > >>>>>> but with different layout is not aligned with this goal, but would
> > >> be
> > >>>>> more
> > >>>>>> aligned with the goal of showing that we can do different fancy
> > >>>> layouts.
> > >>>>> In
> > >>>>>> addition, this logic would allow to have multiple templates for
> the
> > >>>> other
> > >>>>>> usecases as well, with different layout, which would not be a good
> > >>> idea
> > >>>>>> (e.g. another meeting report, with a different layout) because
> > >> would
> > >>>>> bloat
> > >>>>>> the list...
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Anyone else?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>> Anca
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> 3. Meeting
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Should be called Meeting Report (or meeting notes), so that the
> > >>>>>>> difference
> > >>>>>>>> with the meeting extension is more obvious.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I will use "Meeting Report"
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> 4. Simple Page
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Should have the word Table of Contents in the name, so that its
> > >>>>> purpose
> > >>>>>>> is
> > >>>>>>>> obvious from the start (otherwise "simple page" and the default
> > >>>>> "blank
> > >>>>>>>> page" are not very easy to differentiate ).
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> The difference is viewed in the Description, see
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Proposal/TemplatesDefault/WebHome/descriptions.png
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>> Caty
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Another template could be added, "Index page", with a simple
> > >>>>> livetable
> > >>>>>>>> listing all the children (and descendants) pages of the current
> > >>>> page.
> > >>>>>>> It's
> > >>>>>>>> handy when creating the root page of a subtree on the wiki
> > >> (would
> > >>>>> have
> > >>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>> same purpose as "Dashboard", to be a scripted homepage from
> > >> where
> > >>>> the
> > >>>>>>>> subtree of that page can be accessed).
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>>> Anca
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> You can test them on
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>> http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/TemplatesDefault/
> > >>>>>> (use
> > >>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>> Create button)
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Please vote if you agree these templates should be added by
> > >>>> default
> > >>>>>> or
> > >>>>>>>>> otherwise let me know your feedback.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>>>> Caty
> > >>>>>>>>> _________
> > _______________________________________________
> > devs mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Guillaume Delhumeau ([email protected])
> Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
> Committer on the XWiki.org project
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to