> On 17 Jul 2017, at 13:42, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On 17 Jul 2017, at 13:23, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi devs, >>> >>> Needs: >>> * We need some “Deprecated” macro category so that users understand when a >>> macro is deprecated and are less tempted to use it >>> >> >> To be honest I would prefer to not have 'Deprecated' macros at all. > > I think you’re missing the use case and that’s why we still have the Spaces > Macro in the Standard flavor (for example): > > * Imagine you have an XWiki 6.x installed > * Now imagine you want to upgrade to 8.x > * If we remove deprecated macros then suddenly after you upgrade your wiki > you’ll get several pages failing with some red errors telling you that the > macros are not available in your wiki. > > It’s the same reason why there are deprecations in Java: to not break users > or developers. > > So yes we’ll be able to remove deprecated macros one day, when we judge that > enough users have migrated to a recent versions and are no longer using the > deprecated macros. > > I believe it’s still a bit too early for the Spaces macro for example (it was > used by the Space Dashboard template for example). But it’s possible that > once we have 9.x be the LTS, we could think about removing it. > > However there’ll always be use cases for deprecated macros.
FTR and the for the sake of being complete on this discussion, it’s possible to do what you want Caty, but we would need to implement something more complex: * During upgrade, find out if there are macros used (by searching in the wiki for example - but it’s not guaranteed we’ll find all places since the macro usage could be generated by script) that are not bundled anymore and if so propose in the DW UI a step to install them. Thanks -Vincent > >> If >> someone misses some macro he could install it from EM. We keep listing the >> Workspace macro for such a long time. When are we going to remove it? > > I agree that we could remove it now. We just need to decide if we go to the > extra effort of moving it to contrib or just drop it (I’d be in favor of just > dropping it and wait for someone to ask for it - It’s still in the SCM in the > history if we need it one day). > > Thanks > -Vincent > >> >> >>> * We need to not show “Internal” macros by default to not “pollute” the >>> Macro list by default >>> >>> Proposal: >>> * When the “All Macros” is selected display all macros *except* those from >>> 2 categories: “Deprecated” and “Internal”. >>> >> >> Currently in 'Internal' I see just the 'Template' macro. For me that's >> 'Development'. >> >> If it's internal and we don't want people to use it, why are we still >> displaying / bundling them? >> >> Thanks, >> Caty >> >> >>> * If the user needs/wants to use those macros, he’ll need to explicitly >>> select those categories. >>> * When we want to deprecate a Macro we move it from its category to the >>> “Deprecated” category, before removing it further in the future (when is to >>> be defined on an adhoc basis) >>> >>> Technical details: >>> * Change https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/application-ckeditor/ >>> blob/master/plugins/src/main/resources/xwiki-macro/macroSelector.js#L144 >>> to implement this new behavior >>> >>> WDYT? >>> >>> Thanks >>> -Vincent
