On 3/13/14, Vladimir Panteleev <[email protected]> wrote: > However, the biggest problem is the open pull request count. What > good is authoring a patch if no one wants to take time to review > it? > > IMHO, we don't need more bug bounties - we need REVIEWER > bounties. Some way to convince more experienced D developers to > review others' contributions. I have a number of open DMD pull > requests myself, and sometimes I consider bribing someone to just > look at them.
I think I know what's causing this stalling. As more bugs get fixed the bugs that are left opened are the ones which are the most complicated to fix (essentially most of the easy ones are fixed already). E.g. Kenji tends to tackle more and more complex and intricate bugs. So these complicated DMD changesets can only really be reviewed by people with intricate knowledge of the compiler. I don't think there's that many people around with that kind of knowledge. Personally, I've only ever tackled smaller bugs, most of Kenji's changesets go way over my head and I wouldn't be able to merge something like that with confidence, regardless of the autotester. You could easily substitute "PHD" with "DMD" on this page: http://matt.might.net/articles/phd-school-in-pictures/
