On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 11:52:51 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 3/24/15 7:48 AM, Szymon Gatner wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 00:26:13 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
"Szymon Gatner" wrote in message
news:oofoormyfxkefokvk...@forum.dlang.org...
i really try not to be whiny about it but it is sooo
frustrating. d
advertises itself as easy to integrate with c/c++ and maybe
in theory
it is but in practice it is not true at all. simplest
example from
Adam's book I followed crashed miserable so I can only
assume that
-nobody- is mixing c++ with d on Win.
DDMD is mixing D and C++ on all the autotester platforms.
It's not
that simple, but it should be possible.
Honestly, I am not willing to try even less mature compiler
(last month
it was finished?) to try the feature that does not work in the
reference
one.
Don't get me wrong, we do want to be early adopters, but there
is
nothing to adopt yet.
I think you misunderstand. Daniel is citing DDMD project as an
example of C++ and D working together. The output from DDMD
should be identical to DMD, so it's not anything "new" on that
side.
-Steve
Ah, OK. Well, I will try mixing again after 2.067 is released and
report back. From the changelog I don't understand what
improvements have been made to D to increase C++ interop but that
is not so important to us now.
Btw, who is responsible for D output for SWIG?
