On Monday, 20 April 2015 at 22:57:51 UTC, Stewart Gordon wrote:
I committed some updates the other day and they seem they have
gone straight into the online repository.
Committing is a local (non-network) operation in git, so you must
have pushed them afterwards, or your GUI has done this for you.
That mentions a 'shared repository model'. What is that if not
a way of enabling any user to push changes? (That said, it
isn't clear at the moment how to control whether a given
repository is fork-pull or shared, or even whether the
distinction is at the repository setup level or some other.)
The shared repository model rarely applies to open-source
projects, and I don't think it applies to the bindings project.
The module list has no value these days. Most people in that
list no longer use D.
?? The module list is a list of modules, not a list of people.
Sorry, I was talking about the "Assigned to" column. I was
misremembering, I agree it might be worth migrating to the GitHub
Given that SVN is going the way of RCS and CVS, it's not
really an "if".
What do you mean by this?
SVN use, especially in open-source projects, has heavily declined
in the past years. People have begun maintaining their own forks
and mirrors of the bindings project just so they wouldn't have to
muck with SVN. The bindings project needs to move away from SVN
if it is to avoid fragmentation and be friendly to contributions.