On Wednesday, 6 January 2016 at 16:37:24 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
The remaining issue is that that makes the makefile assume git
is installed. Is that reasonable?
I hate to be the one to say this, but I don't think it is
reasonable in the packaged release. In the dev version,
absolutely, but the packaged release is not a git repository, but
still includes the makefile...
However, let's not let the release compromise the development.
The release generation script can run git ls-files itself and do
some string replacement in the relevant files.
- ... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... bachmeier via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... default0 via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... bachmeier via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Better docs for D (WIP... Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Better docs for D (WIP... Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
-