On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Jacob Carlborg via
Digitalmars-d-announce <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
> I was listening to a discussion Don and Daniel had about the current
> implementation of CTFE. They talked about using a byte code interpreter.
> Even implementing a really crappy byte code interpreter would be a huge
> improvement.
> --
> /Jacob Carlborg

Does anyone know whether it would be worth while keeping the LLVM JIT
in mind when writing this new CTFE engine?

Reply via email to