Re: dxml 0.2.0 released

[bachmeier via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Monday, 12 February 2018 at 14:04:38 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:

However, if folks as a whole think that Phobos' xml parser 
needs to support the DTD section to be acceptable, then dxml 
won't replace std.xml, because dxml is not going to implement 
DTD support. DTD support fundamentally does not fit in with 
dxml's design.

Can't you simply give it a name other than std.xml that indicates 
it doesn't do everything related to xml? It doesn't make sense to 
not put it into Phobos because of the name, and that should be an 
easy problem to solve.