http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3463
--- Comment #100 from Andrei Alexandrescu <[email protected]> 2011-04-14 14:03:26 PDT --- (In reply to comment #99) > (In reply to comment #98) > > The work on improving introspection should be done anyway. > > The trouble with using runtime introspection for this is it'll be slow, and > the > scanning of data needs to be really fast. I understand. That still means (and please correct me if I'm wrong) that the right place for specialized code should be at TypeInfo level. Also, I wonder if there's a need for a DSL. Wouldn't automatically-generated Typeinfo methods suffice? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
