http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3463



--- Comment #100 from Andrei Alexandrescu <and...@metalanguage.com> 2011-04-14 
14:03:26 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #99)
> (In reply to comment #98)
> > The work on improving introspection should be done anyway.
> 
> The trouble with using runtime introspection for this is it'll be slow, and 
> the
> scanning of data needs to be really fast.

I understand. That still means (and please correct me if I'm wrong) that the
right place for specialized code should be at TypeInfo level. Also, I wonder if
there's a need for a DSL. Wouldn't automatically-generated Typeinfo methods
suffice?

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

Reply via email to