http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3463
--- Comment #105 from Andrei Alexandrescu <and...@metalanguage.com> 2011-04-14 16:00:24 PDT --- (In reply to comment #104) > (In reply to comment #103) > > I was thinking that the compiler could generate D code that does the > > scanning > > instead of us defining a DSL for that. > > That's a fascinating idea. I think it's just a simple idea. You do generate code for constructors etc. already... -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
