On Thursday, 5 June 2014 at 10:57:37 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 June 2014 at 21:12:25 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
I've been looking at ways to optimize the D lexer's operation
using SIMD instructions. I'm not yet sure if I'll need to
change the lexer generator's API to do this. I'm going to wait
until I have my proof-of-concept code and some benchmark
results before asking for a voting thread or creating a pull
request.
I still thing we should use it more like `std.staging` - once
your updates are ready, go through review/voting and keep
module in `std.experimental` for at least one DMD release
before adding to Phobos core.
This also means relaxing API requirements a lot for initial
inclusion.
I am more for "stdx", which is what some developers already use
as package name for experimental stuff.
