On Friday, 13 June 2014 at 14:59:55 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
Please no.  See: javax

Spelling out 'experimental' is probably the best, for all those reasons
already stated.

What's wrong with javax?

The fact that it started as same experimental package but stuff there never got moved to main namespace or actually changed in breaking fashion. Because many people missed "experimental" part and started using it as normal standard library package.

Reply via email to