On Mon, 09 Jun 2014 14:23:59 -0700 Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 6/9/14, 2:15 PM, Dejan Lekic wrote: > > I am more for "stdx", which is what some developers already use as > > package name for experimental stuff. > > The way I see it is instead of explaining "stdx stands for the > experimental part of std" I'd rather use std.experimental which > explains itself. > > We added "immutable" after having explained to a million people > "invariant in this context means immutable". That and the fact that we'd like to avoid the javax disaster. std.experimental _should_ be annoyingly long and obvious. We want people to use it, but it needs to be clear that it's temporary and _experimental_ until it actually ends up in std. - Jonathan M Davis
